We pushed our changes in our repo 
<https://github.com/T-Systems-MMS/perfsig-jenkins/blob/master/pom.xml#L28>.
Any update to this?

Kind regards,
Raphael


Am Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2016 14:07:06 UTC+1 schrieb Raphael Pionke:
>
> Hey Daniel,
>
> Sorry about the delay, we've developed a lot on the plugin and we're fine 
> with renaming the pluginID to "performance-signature-dynatrace".
> The displayname will be changed to "Performance Signature with Dynatrace".
>
> Are you fine with these changes?
>
> Am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2015 16:44:57 UTC+1 schrieb Daniel Beck:
>>
>> The plugin ID should ideally be close to the display name (as it's used 
>> e.g. in JIRA as component), and obvious about what it is. So 'dynatrace' 
>> should be in there. 
>>
>> On 17.12.2015, at 16:33, Raphael Pionke <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>
>> > Hi Oleg and Wolfgang, 
>> > 
>> > thanks Wolfgang for your answer. 
>> > We got Dynatrace already in the Plugin title: "Performance Signature 
>> with Dynatrace Plugin". 
>> > Do we have to update the artifactId, since we use plugin in several 
>> environments? 
>> > 
>> > Kind regards, 
>> > Raphael 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Am Montag, 23. November 2015 10:38:08 UTC+1 schrieb Wolfgang 
>> Gottesheim: 
>> > Hi, 
>> > 
>> > It looks like I can't post to Google groups from the work email address 
>> I initially used here, sorry about the delay in getting back to you... 
>> > 
>> > - I'm also fine with replacing the current plugin with the new one, as 
>> it kind of replaces/augments the existing plugin anyway. 
>> > - I agree that the "dynatrace" prefix makes sense in any case. 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Am Sonntag, 27. September 2015 21:43:47 UTC+2 schrieb Oleg Nenashev: 
>> > I've added the Dynatrace plugin owner to Cc. It would be great to get 
>> his feedback before going forward. 
>> > 
>> > Even if we go forward with a new plugin: 
>> > * performance-signature is vague IMHO 
>> > * If the plugin is dynatrace-specific, I would prefer to see 
>> "dynatrace" in its name 
>> > 
>> > пятница, 25 сентября 2015 г., 10:25:20 UTC+3 пользователь Raphael 
>> Pionke написал: 
>> > Any update to this? 
>> > 
>> > Kind regards, 
>> > Raphael 
>> > 
>> > Am Dienstag, 22. September 2015 11:09:59 UTC+2 schrieb Raphael Pionke: 
>> > Hi Oleg, 
>> > 
>> > we know the other Dynatrace plugin and after a long evaluation, we have 
>> decided to developed a new plugin with (good) serious reasons 
>> > 
>> >         • completely different Workflow (the new plugin consists of 
>> several build-steps and a post-processing step) 
>> >         • both Plugins can only handle Dynatrace as APM Tool, in future 
>> plugin versions Dynatrace will be replaced by other APM Tools 
>> > the original Plugin can only handle Dynatrace as APM Tool, the new 
>> Plugin is designed to be independent  from a specific APM-Tool (although 
>> currently only Dynatrace is supported) 
>> >         • different approach to gain performance data (the current 
>> plugin uses a xml-report, the new uses Dynatrace Rest API) 
>> >         • code reuse or integration is not imaginable / requires a hugh 
>> effort 
>> >         • the most important thing is; the old Dynatrace plugin can 
>> only handle Unit tests, the new plugin can deal with different kinds of 
>> tests e.g. performance/load test, interfacetest, ui-test … 
>> > I thTo avoid name conflicts the plugin name should be like this: 
>> performance-signature 
>> > 
>> > Regards, 
>> > Raphael 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2015 11:37:20 UTC+2 schrieb Oleg Nenashev: 
>> > There is and existing plugin for Dynatrace, which does the similar 
>> thing. https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Dynatrace+Plugin 
>> > 
>> > What is the difference between plugins? Would it be possible to merge 
>> the functionality? 
>> > 
>> > вторник, 15 сентября 2015 г., 15:00:17 UTC+3 пользователь Raphael 
>> Pionke написал: 
>> > Hi, 
>> > 
>> > this plugin fetches performance values from Dynatrace XML Dashboards 
>> during a build and evaluates and compares the result with previous builds 
>> and non-functional requirements. This plugin uses user-specified XML 
>> Dashboards and PDF detail Reports. Additionally this plugin adds several 
>> build steps to trigger the Dynatrace REST interface. 
>> > 
>> > Plugin name: performance-signature-dynatrace 
>> > Github ID: rpionke 
>> > Repository: https://github.com/T-Systems-MMS/perfsig-jenkins 
>> > 
>> > It would be nice to have it hosted on jekins-ci. 
>> > 
>> > Thanks in advance, 
>> > Raphael 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > -- 
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. 
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an email to [email protected]. 
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/4dcb1967-d92e-42b8-a37e-71152d3971ae%40googlegroups.com.
>>  
>>
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/2e5e6e60-a740-4db4-8718-47041eac37af%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to