2016-03-04 21:14 GMT+01:00 Kanstantsin Shautsou <[email protected]>:

> Cloud delays in theory should be possible to avoid by:
> 1) kicking suggestReview. I wrote plugin but had no ability to test on
> huge installations
> https://github.com/KostyaSha/faster-node-provision-plugin
> 2) increasing one of coefficients for provisioner(or statistics collector,
> forgot classname) (jglick is using it in demo's and i'm using in my
> installations).
>

NodeProvisionner?

Btw, that page might be related IIUC what you talk about. There're many
seemingly (didn't test yet) useful infos about those coeffs and what they
do:
https://cloudbees.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/204690520-Why-do-slaves-show-as-suspended-while-jobs-wait-in-the-queue-

Btw, IIUC, this page might explain why I'm seeing my slave/agent docker
containers being provisionned in between 5 seconds and roughly 6 minutes...


> AFAIK the main jenkins pain is the Queue locks. How this plugin will deal
> with locks?
>
>
>>>> 2016-03-04 12:08 GMT+01:00 nicolas de loof <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yoann and I have extracted from our docker-slaves hack-ish pet project
>>>>> a stable sub-component so a plugin can manage slaves that are dedicated to
>>>>> a Build, not relying on Cloud API, and get them tied to a Build. i.e Slave
>>>>> and Build share a common lifecycle. If Slave fails to start, Build will
>>>>> fail as well. If slave is slow to start (maybe pulling a huge docker
>>>>> image), build log will report the progress.
>>>>> etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> design and use-case :
>>>>> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/One-Shot+Executor
>>>>> code : https://github.com/jenkinsci/one-shot-executor-plugin
>>>>>
>>>>> the current code base do rely on hacks, our goal is to demonstrate
>>>>> this use case (can be tested reusing sample
>>>>> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/one-shot-executor-plugin/blob/master/src/sample/java/org/jenkinsci/plugins/dockerprovisioner/DemoOneShotProvisioner.java>)
>>>>> so we can get the adequate hooks introduced in jenkins-core and later
>>>>> re-implement same API on a cleaner basis.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/f5935828-61d5-4afa-afab-9090deacb19e%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/f5935828-61d5-4afa-afab-9090deacb19e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d65c0d1f-e298-4e08-b5f9-15f883b55f12%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d65c0d1f-e298-4e08-b5f9-15f883b55f12%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7kb2RkXzgQPrv7SS%2BCJVsV79q17sHsVE6pzYXrCh3QHw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to