Right but then without the step failure how can you trap the failure to send the failure email (seems clumsy to have to let the step fail, and then record archive results in the exception handler).
On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 at 2:51:31 PM UTC+11, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > I think the Junit result archiver should mark the build as unstable if > there are failures... > On Mar 21, 2016 7:16 PM, "Michael Neale" <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I am assuming that ignoring test failures doesn't make the shell step >> fail? (Ie it returns a success code?) >> >> If so, removing that and putting try/catch around it and then the archive >> step in the exception handler along with email could work. There may be a >> better way though (as that seems clumsy) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8617dfa6-1348-4a16-93c3-eff3dfca871a%40googlegroups.com >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/3cf940a4-1b20-4153-8be2-e90138c52703%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
