On 14.04.2016, at 00:32, James Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, that is what I was referring to. Is this still a development effort?
We're not changing the storage model for existing job types in 2.0. Doesn't mean it won't go into a later 2.x release though. I CCed Andrew, who should know the current status of the database build storage proposal. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/E452D6A1-F189-4AE7-A322-6A9EFA8A4CA1%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
