Oliver, I think it somehow *has* to be this way due to governance model of Jenkins.
And as Stephen phrased it, the IRC meeting should preferably be only a rubber stamping event on things already discussed and preferably (mostly?) agreed on. On such a subject even more possibly, I guess I would feel uncomfortable if that is only known and discussed during the meeting. (also because that meeting is not evenly easy to attend to the community members depending on many things like personal lives/organization, TZ, and so on). So, +1 from also on the question. So that the subject can actually be tackled quicklier during the gov meeting. My 2 cents -- Baptiste 2016-04-15 12:41 GMT+00:00 Oliver Gondža <[email protected]>: > On 04/15/2016 01:55 PM, Daniel Beck wrote: > >> Hi Antonio, >> >> I put your request on the agenda for the next project meeting. >> > > Do we really need to fill the agenda with tasks like this? How about > several people giving thumbs up/down here to approve asynchronously and > discuss only if there is not consensus? Anyway, here is my +1. > > -- > oliver > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5710E163.4080708%40gmail.com > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANWgJS7mtCsYcddP0Z8k0PJBVET22WqqgxX5Eu5Q7Npna2Uw8w%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
