I think no. JNLP3 shouldn't land and we should try to propose others fixes without it.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Daniel Beck <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 25.04.2016, at 12:22, Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1000 for JENKINS-34213 + TLS certificate fixes > > Has anything changed since the March 30 project meeting, in which we > determined that JENKINS-33886[1] is serious enough to not include newer > remoting versions? I see no notable progress in that issue. > > 1: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-33886 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/D7258BF4-E15B-4EB1-857B-DBF31BA4C09A%40beckweb.net > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFNCU-_AApxnyvJtGrQqWknTXNXEo6cmCwU9y1Jsw4HNtJJVXg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
