Hi Tomas,

I checked your links regarding the plugins. I created a micro site based on 
http://updates.jenkins-ci.org/current/update-center.json you can find the 
source in https://github.com/scherler/jenkins-plugin-site and a demo in 
http://plugin-site.stax.net/ (it is still under development).

It is a simple rendering of the plugin list as taken from 
updates.jenkins-ci.org/current/update-center.json to make the information 
of plugins searchable and filterable.

It is based on a node server that processes the jsonp creates a in.memory 
"poor-mans" database (if you want to go so far to call it db) and then 
serves as REST backend e.g. http://plugin-site.stax.net/plugins 
or http://plugin-site.stax.net/labels. The front end is based on react.js 
and redux.

That would be easy adoptable to pull from different market places. I 
actually think even having the current plugins in a market place would 
allow as well features like rating, favorites, custom grouping, etc. 
Instead of using above jsonp source I would rather use a REST/CORS server 
that provides thus data.

salu2

On Monday, May 2, 2016 at 3:08:42 PM UTC+2, Tomas Bjerre wrote:
>
> This is great!
>
> I tried to come up with a solution for this myself. The plugins are (in my 
> opinion) the only good thing about Jenkins. I would never use it if it was 
> not for the plugins. A solution like this is needed, so that plugin 
> developers can avoid situations like this:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/jenkinsci-dev/git-changelog/jenkinsci-dev/Jsck8GgWwJg/GAZV8Y0-CAAJ
>
> Competition is a good thing. But competition is not allowed among Jenkins 
> plugins. Its very frustrating when you dont want to contribute to an 
> existing plugin. Perhaps because of the way a problem is solved in an 
> existing one. If you want to solve the same problem, or similar, in a 
> different way, you will be denied. Or forced to merge you code into the 
> existing one. Like in my case with the git-changelog-plugin. It is now 
> causing confusion among users.
>
> I'd like to see an independent marketplace where plugins can be published, 
> rated and reviewed. Just like the Atlassian Marketplace works. I started 
> working on something like that (
> https://github.com/tomasbjerre/jenkins-plugins/ and 
> http://www.jenkins-plugins.com/) but have not had time to finish it.
>
> -Tomas
>
> Den torsdag 28 april 2016 kl. 12:44:59 UTC+2 skrev Sergei Egorov:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> Remember Jucies? ( https://github.com/jucies/releases ) - experimental 
>> update center for Jenkins with releases directly from GitHub?
>>
>> Today it became much better!
>>
>> Starting from today, GitHub releases will be used to release your plugin. 
>> That said, no publish, no PRs to update your plugin's version. Just create 
>> a release on GitHub and it will be hooked up by Jucies in a few minutes.
>>
>> For example, here is Pipeline View plugin released on Jucies:
>>
>> https://github.com/jucies/releases/blob/master/plugins/pipeline-view.properties
>>
>> As you can see - no version here, only repository reference, where 
>> release exists:
>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-view-plugin/releases
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, I'm happy to say that Build Graph Plugin and Build Name Setter 
>> Plugin were using Jucies to release their plugins as well. Wooo!
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/bd46e706-e131-4956-b42c-7e56db1234ab%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to