I'm pro #3 given timeframes - it'll be at least a week or so for 2.4.7 to get released (given time to get the vote started/finished, etc) at best, and I'd prefer not to pull in unreleased changes we don't know we *need*.
A. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:58 AM, Daniel Beck <m...@beckweb.net> wrote: > > > On 20.05.2016, at 16:53, Daniel Spilker <m...@daniel-spilker.com> wrote: > > > > I would go for option 3 or 4, but I'm undecided between the two. Option > 3 reduces the risk with a minimal diff. But with option 4 the diff to the > official 2.4.7 should be minimal, so we could update to an official release > within the LTS line. > > We may already be past the LTS window (decision on June 8), so 3. would be > my favored approach as it's more likely that Oliver accepts the back port > of patched Groovy. That said, it's ultimately up to him. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/A3DF5430-8B05-491D-B9BE-21ADEA2F2A15%40beckweb.net > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPbPdObak8ejWCq_L7-0P77Z3NEAJeiQHrfM9QXfB%2BSabdFzOQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
