Looks cool Gus.

On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 at 5:43:22 AM UTC+9, Gus Reiber wrote:
>
> +1 to GitHub readme as well. Why put the same doc in 2 places.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 1:30:24 PM UTC-7, slide wrote:
>>
>> +1 for the effort, ideally I'd like to see something that can pull 
>> information from the github README.md files and have people push updates to 
>> the descriptions that would be shown to their own plugin repositories. 
>> Perhaps some of the other information could be pulled from a metadata file 
>> that was also in the plugin repository. 
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 1:02 PM Gus Reiber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>    So I have on and off pushed the idea that the Jenkins community could 
>>> benefit greatly from an overhaul of the wiki based plugins site. As an 
>>> ultimate goal, I don't see any reason we couldn't build something that 
>>> approach a modern app store, like https://play.google.com/store, but 
>>> for the short run, it seems like we should be able to improove upon the 
>>> browsing experience of the existing list page and detail view.
>>>
>>> Existing: 
>>>
>>>    - list: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Plugins
>>>    - detail: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Pipeline+Plugin
>>>
>>> I think as a minimum, we ought to be able to provide a reasonable search 
>>> interface and means of filtering plugins by maintainer, Jenkins core 
>>> requirement, plugins labels, and installation count. Plugins should also be 
>>> assigned to categories that map to Jenkins user expectations a bit better 
>>> than the current list of ~30ish maintainer assigned labels do today. 
>>> Ideally the user ought to be able to manage the list of all plugins by 
>>> specific features of the plugin and by some suggestion of quality or 
>>> currentness of the plugin.
>>>
>>> At various points, my interest in bringing this value to the community 
>>> has been great enough to assemble a couple of different prototypes and 
>>> wireframes, attempting to generate interest. I have also had a chance to 
>>> play with some prototypes from others all with what seems to me to be 
>>> reasonable implementation paths. Attached are a few more recent sketches 
>>> showing the gist of how we might handle searching and filtering as well as 
>>> the plugin details.
>>>
>>> Anyway, at the moment, the plugin site is maintained by our 
>>> representatives here in the community. So it is really the will of the 
>>> community that should be reflected in any efforts that are actually 
>>> deployed and later maintained by our community. Thus again, I am looking 
>>> for grass roots support for the effort, support that potentially includes 
>>> some avenue for long term hosting and support.
>>>
>>> So my questions are these: Is enhancing the plugin site really worth 
>>> that degree of effort to the community? If you think it is, would you be 
>>> willing to join the effort, both for the immediate development needs, but 
>>> also for longer term support? Do you have any experience with other 
>>> communities who manage to accomplish this sort of ends?
>>>
>>> ...and finally, could you help articulate a set of minimum requirements 
>>> that would make overhauling the plugin site worth while?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Gus
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/33ab5051-e2b8-4684-8d9e-0d5aa6ab1284%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/33ab5051-e2b8-4684-8d9e-0d5aa6ab1284%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5eebcfb4-e11e-4b80-9dc7-9b2a941c0649%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to