Thanks for those kind words Kohsuke. More inline...

On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 2:32:48 AM UTC, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote:
>
> Thanks James,
>
> This is an important and exciting JEP for me, because it sets the mission 
> & scope for a new project “Jenkins X.”
> Starting from Jenkins 2, in contributor events and Jenkins Worlds, I’ve 
> always pitched that our Jenkins project needs to take a bigger role and 
> responsibility in serving our users and solving their challenges. 
> Historically, by and large we did it by writing plugins, but we’ve been so 
> successful in doing that, now we need to create solutions that combine 
> those plugins.
>
>
> I said “starting from Jenkins 2” because the default recommended set of 
> plugins, initial setup wizard to start Jenkins more securely, and so on was 
> the first step toward us doing more than writing plugins.
>
> Blue Ocean followed, in which we focused on important parts of Jenkins and 
> provided great UX for that. It decidedly blended together feature areas 
> that are internally provided by a whole bunch of different plugins, but 
> users see much less seam between them now.
>
> Jenkins Essentials, which Tyler posted in recent weeks, is one more step 
> forward. That project is aiming to take an even bigger responsibility in 
> keeping people’s Jenkins instances up and running, and further de-emphasize 
> individuality of plugins and emphasize the combined solution.
>
> I see Jenkins X very much on this same path. Jenkins X brings a different 
> aspect to building a solution — it focuses on a specific vertical area, a 
> Kubernetes application development, and really drastically simplify the 
> software development by bringing together Jenkins, a whole bunch of 
> plugins, the opinionated best practice of how you should use Kubernetes.
>
> Especially early in the days of Jenkins, this kind of integration was done 
> by heroic Jenkins admins and provided for the organizations they were 
> working in, but they were never really shared upstream in the community. So 
> we all had to re-invent that.
>
> Jenkins X is a significant step because it is trying to bring those 
> hard-earned integration work back into the community. It makes Jenkins 
> approachable and valuable to a whole new set of users who are not currently 
> using Jenkins.
>
> From that perspective, I hope more projects like this will follow, in 
> different domains of software development. This is a little bit like how 
> Eclipse has evolved from just a Java IDE to an umbrella of projects.
>
>
> On top of all that, the icing on the cake, or the main cake, depending on 
> who you are, is that Kubernetes application development is a very exciting 
> area of technology where there’s a lot of interest. I’m sure many of you 
> are already doing that or thinking about doing that, and so this project 
> should be useful to many folks.
>


For me, one of the most rewarding things about Open Source is being able to 
learn from others in the community whether via code, docs, demos, email, 
issues or chat. A lot of things have changed in our industry in the last 
few years around containers, Kubernetes, cloud, DevOps & CI/CD best 
practices. So I'm hoping that even if you are not yet ready to use 
Kubernetes in your day job or are not yet interested in automating your 
Continuous Delivery; that you'll at least consider taking a look at Jenkins 
X - if for no other reason than to help you learn more about all these new 
ideas, technologies and approaches. 

We'd love any feedback you might have. Pull Requests are always welcome too 
;)

 

> I know James has a lot of ideas of what he can do on Jenkins X, and I also 
> fundamentally believe that a lot of good ideas also come from outside. So 
> please help James and his team build a better software by participating in 
> the effort. If you don't feel like you don't have any specific point to 
> make, even just providing them an encouragement would help them feel good 
> to press forward in the current direction. That's an useful feedback on its 
> own.
>
> I hope we’ll see a very lively discussion.
>

Agreed. I'll try get a blog post together soon introducing Jenkins X to try 
answer the question of why I think folks might be interested in taking it 
for a spin...

-- 
James 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e0e744a1-b035-4a63-bee3-60ac9299a572%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to