(replies inline) On Fri, 13 Apr 2018, Jesse Glick wrote:
> Filed a draft request: > > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/pull/84 Jesse this is a very thorough and well-thought out document! Thank you so much for putting the effort into it. I understand that you have prototyped this work with strictly plugins at this point, and the document makes allusions to core and 'modules' potentially being able to use this same approach and tooling. The only question I had was whether you think it's important to verify that core and modules function with this model before rolling out this type of a design? From the IEP-9 standpoint, I don't really care what tooling is required to get incremental builds into the maven repository, but I'm not sure if you consider applicability to core part of "acceptance criteria" for this design. I hope the question makes sense, put more shortly: does core need to be figured out for this to come into effect? Have a good weekend :D -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/20180414002112.GE1836%40grape.lasagna.io. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Description: PGP signature