On 2018-05-21 14:26, Daniel Beck wrote:
The current packaging (or at least the bits that don't declare a Java dependency) has been used in weekly releases for a long time successfully, and probably for the 2.89.x line and older as well. We document the intended behavior on the repo index page (see PR discussion). It's just an oversight that resulted in the outdated packaging being used for 2.107.1 and 2.107.2.
Hmm, I was under impression 1.107.3 was the first LTS with given packaging change but you are right, it was in 2.73 and 2.89 as well.
IMO we could mention this in the upgrade guide, complete with explanation similar to the package repo index pages, and done. No reason to diverge LTS packaging from weekly packaging deliberately.
If we do not intend to "fix" that (and I am not saying we should), then yes. -- oliver -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/be120f20-53ad-4682-4fda-62b3d5ffa322%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
