Sorry, I thought that was what I was saying. I should have been clearer. On Wednesday, 12 September 2018 19:39:35 UTC+1, Jesse Glick wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 4:18 AM steadyonabix <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > I think the simple build step wouldn't help, as I would then have to > ensure that it was run first, thereby reintroducing the specific run order. > > You cannot have a step which configures and starts the scanner, runs > it on whatever, and then shuts it down? Why does this need to be > complicated? >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/26e7b0c2-ec7a-4da1-881f-51fa92cbc7b2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
