(evil top post!) This looks reasonable to me, and I've got no problem with an umbrella of "TechMatrix Jenkins Platform Package for X" so long as it's a legitimate Jenkins under there :)
On Wed, 03 Oct 2018, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: > On behalf of TechMatrix, Inc. I???d like to request the permission to use the > following name that uses ???Jenkins??? in it: > > - TechMatrix Jenkins Platform Package > > I have relationship with the people in TechMatrix who's doing this through > the community (they are the key people behind Jenkins User Conference in > Tokyo) and CloudBees (they are our partner in Japan.) Their time zone is > not conducive to direct participation in the meeting, so I'm doing this on > behalf of them. They have also requested "Jenkins Day Japan" event name in > the past that got subsequently approved. > > > To help people understand how this name is going to be used, let me > describe a bit about the effort for which we???d like to use this name. > > TechMatrix Jenkins Platform Package (TJPP) is a package of Jenkins, code > analysis tools, testing tools and so on, integrated to work well together. > TechMatrix is offering this commercial solution to companies who can't / > don't want to assemble those pieces themselves, it's a way of helping > customers get more out of pieces that TechMatrix individually sells. > > TJPP is meant as an aggregated umbrella brand name for these integrated > solutions, under which different solutions for different audience/context > will come in as "TechMatrix Jenkins Platform Package for $SOMETHING". The > first solution is "TechMatrix Jenkins Platform Package for Java", which > combines CI with Jenkins and Parasoft JTest (static analysis, unit testing > tools), further extensible to test, deployment, releases and so on. The > possible future expansions include "for C/C++", "for C#", and so on. > > Technically, I'm not sure if the approval for TJPP implicitly cover "TJPP > for $SOMETHING" or not, but it seems pretty clear to me that if we are OK > with TJPP, we have no reasons to object to any "TJPP for $SOMETHING", so in > order to skip the unnecessary work for everyone, I'd like us to be able to > give them a blanket sublicensing approval for "TJPP for $SOMETHING" > > I'll put this in the next week's project meeting agenda, but given that I'm > only proxying this, if you have concerns and questions, please raise it > here beforehand so that they can respond in time. > -- > Kohsuke Kawaguchi > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAN4CQ4xWkyd7cOtBccqpqCL_22fhGm63A9OeW%2B5f-bH-72z5Wg%40mail.gmail.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- GitHub: https://github.com/rtyler Twitter: https://twitter.com/agentdero -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/20181003211834.GI28842%40grape.brokenco.de. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
