夏润泽 and I started documenting this JEP and initial code. If anyone is 
interested in helping let us know. 

On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 5:55:45 AM UTC-8, 夏润泽 wrote:
>
> I also think that creating a prototype is a good suggestion, we can 
> contact on gitter
>
> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 8:05:51 PM UTC+8, Marky Jackson wrote:
>>
>> I agree that creating a prototype is the best path forward.
>> We can split the work up for documenting that yaml format and the cli 
>> options.
>> I will wait to hear from RunzeXia and we can have further discussion 
>> (please reach out to me on gitter or via email).
>> Thanks kindly.
>> {     
>>    "regards" : {
>>         "name" : “marky”,
>>         "phone" : "+1 (408) 464 2965”,
>>         "email" : “[email protected]",
>>         "team" : "jackson5“
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2019, at 2:22 AM, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After reading the proposal from RunzeXia in this pull request 
>> <https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/2055>, I think that 
>> the official Kubernetes Operator could be built on the top of the Custom 
>> WAR/Docker Packager <https://github.com/jenkinsci/custom-war-packager> 
>> which already supports managing Jenkins versions, plugins and 
>> configurations via JCasC/Groovy (blog 
>> <https://jenkins.io/blog/2018/10/16/custom-war-packager/>). It's 
>> configured via YAML and it can already produce Docker images and standalone 
>> WAR files. 
>>
>> I believe that CWP could be adjusted to support the Kubernetes Operator 
>> mode, even for Kubernetes deployments without Docker. The same Custom War 
>> Packager is used in Jenkins X Serverless, so we can make the configurations 
>> somewhat portable between "Serverless Jenkins" modes and more classic K8s 
>> operators. What do you think?
>>
>> Who/how can we go about starting this? I will gladly upload my code but 
>>> it might be best to have some guidelines or plan
>>>
>>
>> If the Kubernetes Operator requires a lot of design and requires 
>> long-term compatibility, it might be reasonable to create a prototype, 
>> agree on that in this thread and then to create a specification Jenkins 
>> Enhancement Proposal <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep> to document YAML 
>> formats and the command line options. 
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 3:05:27 AM UTC+1, [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Who/how can we go about starting this? I will gladly upload my code but 
>>> it might be best to have some guidelines or plan
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 9:25:27 PM UTC-8, 夏润泽 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Very good, I think we can start working from your operator
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 12:42:38 AM UTC+8, Marky Jackson 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve done some current operator work and have submitted an upcoming 
>>>>> talk on operators. 
>>>>> I would love to even just tinker with this idea
>>>>>
>>>>> {     
>>>>>    "regards" : {
>>>>>         "name" : “marky”,
>>>>>         "phone" : "+1 (408) 464 2965”,
>>>>>         "email" : “[email protected]",
>>>>>         "team" : "jackson5“
>>>>>     }
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Jesse Glick <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 7:56 AM 夏润泽 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> we could use the k8s jenkins operator to do more things, such as the 
>>>>> health status of jenkins (whether the configuration is consistent and the 
>>>>> necessary components are normal)、 automatic update based on Jenkins 
>>>>> Evergreen…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There is nothing being done in this area currently. Sounds like a
>>>>> sensible addition to
>>>>>
>>>>> https://jenkins.io/sigs/cloud-native/#areas-for-improvement
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr24Y6Vpq2YnUXT3BubDuuzpTXmw-fCgoeeVpM0PTMx%3Dsw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/9ea9a62b-382d-48c0-8ed0-28e930198086%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/9ea9a62b-382d-48c0-8ed0-28e930198086%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/3e6edab7-ea9f-42aa-90ab-c07ac8eb9dde%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to