On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:44 PM Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote: > If the “classboxed” dependencies have scope=provided then they shouldn’t be > transitive and you could leave them unshaded.
True. `war/pom.xml` would need to be massaged to bundle them. > The JenkinsRule would just need to setup the classloaders from the war and > all would be fine That “just” is JENKINS-41827. I believe writing such a harness is feasible—I have done so in the past (see link in JIRA)—but migrating existing functional tests to run in a new harness may not be straightforward. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CANfRfr3QdyFTegLWWYxuuro6GFhim9QFk1D3_GuAAK61p1Rwbg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
