Oleg & Fred,
Very good question. I am actually not sure myself, exactly what these
restrictions mean. I am going to run it by one of our lawyers and get back
to you. I will try and get more clarity...
Best Regards
Scott M
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 10:00:32 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> FTR https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/826 for CentOS.
>
> Regarding UBI, I have the same concern as Fred. We have no tools to
> enforce the Export limitations on DockerHub. I am also not sure that
> restricting specific countries according to US laws is compliant with how
> the Jenkins open-source project operates. IIRC we used to have contributors
> from the countries restricted by US.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg
>
>
> On Monday, June 17, 2019 at 7:01:48 PM UTC+2, Fred Blaise wrote:
>>
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> What do you think of the export restrictions in the EULA? (some ref:
>> https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/15/740.17)
>>
>> Any chance you could confirm internally with Redhat that UBI is 100% fit
>> for Jenkins open-source?
>>
>> Thank you.
>> Best,
>> fred
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 15, 2019 at 11:14:40 PM UTC+2, Scott McCarty wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>> I saw this thread a while back, but couldn't respond until after we
>>> launched UBI publicly. UBI follows the RHEL lifecycle, but has the added
>>> bonus that 1. new versions come out before CentOS and 2. receives RHEL
>>> updates (exact same RPMS). You can build on think of it as CentOS+ when ran
>>> anywhere, with the added bonus that it can be run on RHEL/OpenShift and be
>>> fully supported by Red Hat. It's distributed under a different EULA than
>>> other Red Hat which does allow redistribution of Red Hat trademarks in the
>>> content set (YUM/RPMS, images, etc). Also, we will likely add packages in
>>> the future, but will never remove them. Feel free to ping me if you have
>>> any questions ([email protected]) or this email...
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/introducing-red-hat-universal-base-image
>>> -
>>>
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/containers/#/product/5c180b28bed8bd75a2c29a63
>>>
>>> Scott M (@fatherlinux)
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 10, 2019 at 4:09:56 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> FYI there is a pull request for CentOS image in Jenkins Docker packages
>>>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/docker/pull/826
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 5:29:20 PM UTC+1, R Tyler Croy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (replies inline)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Olblak wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > But I am wondering, instead of going with Centos why not using this
>>>>> PPA <https://launchpad.net/~openjdk-r/+archive/ubuntu/ppa> with
>>>>> ubuntu?
>>>>> > This would imply a smaller breaking change
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not believe that Jenkins should rely on any PPA (Personal Package
>>>>> Archive), they have a tendency of growing stale unlike mainstream
>>>>> official
>>>>> packages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> GitHub: https://github.com/rtyler
>>>>>
>>>>> GPG Key ID: 0F2298A980EE31ACCA0A7825E5C92681BEF6CEA2
>>>>>
>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/d20edbdf-b6a3-4463-931b-7fbacfb33c2e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
