Agreed there. I'd be interested in that JEP. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:47 AM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote: > > With the current scope of Affected components JEP would be definitely great > > On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 5:21:20 PM UTC+1, Chris Kilding wrote: >> >> I'm currently working out the details of JENKINS-60897, an enhancement to >> enable the folders plugin to provide an access control layer over any >> credentials provider. This would affect several components (all credential >> providers, credentials API, CasC, folders plugin, maybe more). It may also >> be relevant to other access control features Jenkins has. Therefore it might >> be worth expanding into a JEP. >> >> Thoughts? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/5758c026-29d1-4339-bb37-b5d5cb8507ca%40googlegroups.com.
-- Matt Sicker Senior Software Engineer, CloudBees -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAEot4oyp_rBxfVOi8EgjB%2B1%2BsV9NqiutJr8D%2BkuGfz13gc_z-g%40mail.gmail.com.
