Leave it to Oleg to save my a** ;-)

On Thursday, January 30, 2020 at 5:16:45 PM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote:
>
> I would join as mentor as well
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020, 17:05 Jon Brohauge <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>> This is something I'd love to see get accepted into GSoC 2020. I'd even 
>> volunteer being a mentor for this. Although a more technical mentor would 
>> probably be needed alongside.
>>
>> Rgds,
>> Jon
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 11:23:31 AM UTC+1, Ullrich Hafner wrote:
>>>
>>> I started a document for the project idea:
>>>
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fl3sF0mArtv2THOjPSZvNufGme4P24BtT0BirHMeMRY/edit?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Feel free to extend or comment.
>>>
>>> Am 28.01.2020 um 13:12 schrieb Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> + Ullrich Hafner who was interested to write up a project idea for this 
>>> topic.
>>> I would be happy to be a mentor there, and I believe we could find more 
>>> mentors to make it happen
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:55 PM Sladyn Nunes <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 
>>>> "ChatOps" triggers would be highly beneficial thereby letting the 
>>>> github-branch-source to run the required checks on specific parts. Also 
>>>> detailed reports from GitHub Checks could be published and maybe parsed as 
>>>> required.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 6:27 PM Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Just to bump this thread, we consider adding Checks API integration as 
>>>>> a GSoC 2020 project idea.
>>>>> We had a preliminary discussion with Ulli Hafner (Warnings NG) and 
>>>>> other parties.
>>>>>
>>>>> If someone is interested to join the project, please let me know
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 5:56:28 PM UTC+2, Jesse Glick wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Steven F <[email protected]> 
>>>>>> wrote: 
>>>>>> > The examples in the article show elements such as linting, 
>>>>>> > build, static analysis as separate and individually runnable 
>>>>>> things. In 
>>>>>> > Jenkins 2.x Pipeline it feels like bundling these things together 
>>>>>> is more 
>>>>>> > encouraged. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, it is generally more straightforward to have those things be run
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> as part of a single Jenkins build, triggered by SCM changes. What is 
>>>>>> missing is an API which would allow Jenkins report plugins (`Publisher
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> & SimpleBuildStep`, for example) to indicate to the system that there
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> is some information to be displayed in an abstract “change request”, 
>>>>>> perhaps associated with source code lines, which would then be 
>>>>>> implemented by `github-branch-source` with the Checks API. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: 
>>>>>> > just rerunning the job from github would save a step 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See JENKINS-45455 for rerunning generally; again we would need a new 
>>>>>> API to allow this is to be integrated with in-PR “chatops” triggers, 
>>>>>> so that `github-branch-source` could receive GH events and refire them
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> as requests to rerun parts of a build, which 
>>>>>> `pipeline-model-definition` would then interpret as a Declarative 
>>>>>> build trigger. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All this would allow you to do more from GitHub and less from Blue 
>>>>>> Ocean or the Jenkins “classic” UI. @abayer has done the most work in 
>>>>>> this area and should probably be commenting. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8215b84f-fd28-4066-a8d6-473683a43282%40googlegroups.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/8215b84f-fd28-4066-a8d6-473683a43282%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/UGhDM5lcz8Y/unsubscribe
>>>> .
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>> [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAC-Leqttb4%3DVhSnd%3DKLeq69GioC4mzmpyadcJUG0gdX9TN%3DbOw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAC-Leqttb4%3DVhSnd%3DKLeq69GioC4mzmpyadcJUG0gdX9TN%3DbOw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/UGhDM5lcz8Y/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/465bce4a-321b-444a-b0ae-594ff1e42e8c%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/465bce4a-321b-444a-b0ae-594ff1e42e8c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c740c5b0-dc34-41bd-bf54-a8b51069afb6%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to