On Monday, 2 March 2020 12:56:10 UTC, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:50 PM Stephen Connolly <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Similarly, if I come back in 2 years and see that Bob who adopted the >> foobar plugin from me has done nothing with it in the past year... should I >> need to wait for bob's timeout of two weeks to pick up the plugin? >> >> For sure if Bob is maintaining the plugin actively and has commits etc >> then Bob should be respected... but if Bob is don;t nothing and hasn't >> moved himself to Emeritus, should he be entitled to block me from picking >> the plugin back up?\ >> > > This all makes sense in a way, but then we get to choose between a really > complex decision tree (what even counts as actively maintained?), or just > improvising every time (i.e. have a vaguely defined judgment call in there > somewhere). > > I'm fine with "have a vaguely defined judgment call in there somewhere" for whether Emeritus gets fast track or not in the presence of active maintainers.
The important part for me is that I don't have to worry in the case that the plugin is not actively maintained -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/12bd482f-cc57-420c-b02b-9d3d6e55f151%40googlegroups.com.
