+1 for 2.235, assuming that we are conservative about merges this week. On Wednesday, April 29, 2020 at 5:47:41 PM UTC+2, Tim Jacomb wrote: > > 2.235 would also be my preference, I've got 2 (hopefully) last system read > PRs, I would love to get in before the LTS > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 14:54, Daniel Beck <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> >> >> > On 29. Apr 2020, at 12:44, Oliver Gondža <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> > >> > In accordance we recently approved process changes, we are doing next >> baseline section two weeks earlier in the cycle. >> >> Assuming nobody merges something crazy into core this week, I'm for 2.235. >> >> We've moved the baseline decision earlier to give us the freedom to >> choose a very recent release without a lot of risk and overlapping work >> schedules, since we'll have 4 weeks to identify and fix problems and back >> port those fixes. So I propose we try this and see how it goes. >> >> (FWIW we probably want to figure out what to do about JENKINS-61937 >> before the new LTS lands…) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/900CA800-A7CB-486B-B49A-93DF05F30CB8%40beckweb.net >> . >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/c34d0118-503e-42e3-b6e3-e57384621cf0%40googlegroups.com.
