Hello Robert, Unfortunately we did not get to this topic today at the meeting. The consensus is that we would be doing it in the mailing list. Unfortunately the meeting was already in progress when your response arrived, and we did not consider the interim solution. So let's keep discussing it here.
My IMHO: To be published on an interim basis, it would need an explicit sign-off from the Governance Board, Jenkins Security Officer, and a general consensus among participants of this thread. It would also need to comply with other criteria defined for hosting plugins. Best regards, Oleg On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 8:40 PM Robert Reeves <r...@datical.com> wrote: > We absolutely have! Thanks! > > I would love for you to bring it up at the Governance meeting today. Would > it be possible to resolve this at an agreed upon date and release it as is > in the interim? If it isn't resolved by the agreed date, I would expect the > plugin to be unpublished. > > Please let me know the team's toughts! > > Robert > > On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 at 11:38:19 AM UTC-5, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> I confirm that there is a problem with the current library distribution, >> and that we could not distribute it as is according to the current >> Governance document. I am happy to bring up this topic at the today's >> governance meeting, but my personal recommendation is to consider technical >> solutions which would prevent bundling of the proprietary library in the >> plugin. >> >> Did you consider suggestions by Daniel in the Infra ticket? >> >> Flyway is implemented as a tool installer, so the Jenkins project only >>> distributes pure OSS: >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/flyway-runner-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/sp/sd/flywayrunner/installation/FlywayInstaller.java >>> >>> Similar approaches were done in the past; a popular one for a while was >>> to have an "installer" plugin, like >>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/cloudbees-enterprise-plugins-plugin – then >>> the only bits actually distributed by the Jenkins project are under an open >>> source license. >>> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Oleg >> >> On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 3:45:31 PM UTC+2, Robert Reeves wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding the blocker on releasing the fixed Liquibase Plugin, I wanted >>> to start a conversation on releasing the plugin. >>> >>> >>> >>> https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/INFRA-2622 >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >>> >>> Robert >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/jenkinsci-dev/dRz1QP_ndPo/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/7c34dd49-fe46-4e54-83ef-f69b74d5de75%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/7c34dd49-fe46-4e54-83ef-f69b74d5de75%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAPfivLBX8mb0rs78BdHgMVkqJhKxSkBoKXSKzCcqiBTh%3DeLm%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com.
