This is distinction I was trying to make in my response to "Terminology 
Updates 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-dev/CLR55wMZwZ8/QBVmN70vBwAJ>", 
without the self-evident and clear distinction between node, agent and 
executor Daniel illustrated so well. 


> I see "the master" as having two contexts. There is the Administrative 
> context (configuration, plugins etc.), that determine focus, capability, 
> delegation. Then there's the context of those tasks that are necessary to 
> execute "on the master". What about the tasks run on master? It's still 
> executors doing the work... 
>

That is why I proposed using two names for the different contexts: 
"Executive" for the administrative portion of master,  and "Concierge" for 
the task execution. 
AgentZero (or NodeZero) also has a nice ring to it for that context, should 
another name be chosen for the "Master".

Personally, I always found the glossary definitions rather confusing

> *Agent*: An agent is typically a *machine*, or *container*, which 
> connects to a Jenkins *master *and executes tasks when directed by the 
> master.
> *Master*:  The central, coordinating *process *which stores 
> configuration, loads plugins, and renders the various user interfaces for 
> Jenkins.
> *Node*: A *machine *which is part of the Jenkins environment and capable 
> of executing Pipelines or Projects. 
> Both the *Master *and *Agents *are considered to be *Nodes*.
>

As defined, an agent is a machine, a node is a machine, but a master is a 
"process". Master is considered to be a Node, which implies it's a machine 
even though that's not in the definition. The definition of master also 
mentions nothing about executing Pipelines or Projects; that must be 
inferred.

We can have multiple Nodes running on the same remote server (under 
different accounts - aka agents ?). 
We can also have a Node configured on the same server as the master, but 
it's not master.

I am not an taxonomist nor a linguist, perhaps just a little pedantic: 
concerned with formalism, accuracy, and precision.

I have perhaps wrongly interpreted the Node to be Jenkins master's 
representation of the server/container + account the agent is running on. 
There also happens to be an agent that runs on master. 

When you add a Node, it's a combination of the host+account (plus 
environment) that the agent is launched under.

If I'm completely off-base, please disregard. If any of this makes sense, 
the definitions in the glossary should get some attention. If it makes more 
sense, then there are two contexts for "master" that need to de documented 
and given names to avoid ambiguity.


Regards,
Ian

On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 11:08:12 UTC-7, Gavin Mogan wrote:
>
> > By default, a new Jenkins installation has 1 node (the master) with 2 
> executors, and 0 agents. 
>
> this sentence has made it the most clear I've ever been about it. Thank you
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 4:41 AM Daniel Beck <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On 21. Jul 2020, at 23:05, 'Martin Schmude' via Jenkins Developers <
>> [email protected] <javascript:>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > This reminds me of that I am worried from time to time by the terms 
>> "agent" and "node".
>> > They seem to be synonyms - am I right?
>> > If so, shouldn't "agent" be the preferred term, due to the decision of 
>> 2016 and "node" be dropped?
>> > 
>>
>> These terms are useful and consistent, as master can also be a node. By 
>> default, it's even the only node.
>>
>> So "node" is an term for "master and agents" (at least the "executing 
>> workloads" part of master, see my and others' feedback to the ongoing 
>> terminology update that it could make sense to use different terms here).
>>
>> > to me, node = executor, but not really
>>
>> One node can have multiple executors. Executors are individual slots for 
>> a single workload.
>>
>> By default, a new Jenkins installation has 1 node (the master) with 2 
>> executors, and 0 agents.
>>
>> All of that is also explained in 
>> https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/glossary/
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/9636A16D-1011-47E7-BCEE-A6738024B660%40beckweb.net
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e8303a33-3386-4b22-8e1c-88c6ce0cd384o%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to