If you're going by neat numbers, 2.255 would be the coolest. ;)

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 8:03 AM Tim Jacomb <[email protected]> wrote:

> I vote for 2.250, with some backporting needed.
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:59, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would vote for 2.250. 2.250 has no functional difference from 2.249,
>> there is just one internal fix. 2.250 is a fancy number, so why not?
>>
>> 2.249/2.250 still have issues after the .NET Framework 2.0 support
>> removal. Both issues need some fixes and upgrade guidelines. I believe that
>> I will be able to prepare and integrate the fixes by the next LTS RC in 4
>> weeks. If we want to take older version without regressions, it would be
>> 2.247 which lacks many other important patches. I'd rather go ahead with
>> the version and get it fixed.
>>
>>    - Windows Agent Installer Module:
>>    https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-63198
>>    - WMI Windows Agents installer:
>>    https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-63223
>>
>> +1 to Daniel's comment about UI changes. As discussed at the last UX SIG
>> meeting we have an option to backport fixes for UI before the RC date if
>> there is a consensus.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 29, 2020 at 1:54:42 PM UTC+2, Daniel Beck wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this about https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4867 ? We can
>>> always backport that change if needed.
>>>
>>> Or, with some merge discipline we could tentatively choose 2.251 and
>>> fall back to 2.250/2.249 (which are basically identical) if something we
>>> don't want makes it in.
>>>
>>> 2.250 is a nicer number but might cause confusion with 2.150 which was
>>> also an LTS baseline, so would tentatively prefer 2.249 for greater Hamming
>>> distance.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 1:20 PM Ullrich Hafner <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That means that we have the intermediate black table headers in it :-(
>>>>
>>>> Am 29.07.2020 um 13:14 schrieb Antonio Muñiz <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> This is the full list of bugs reported after the previous LTS release
>>>> date
>>>> <https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-63169?jql=component%20%3D%20core%20and%20project%20%3D%20JENKINS%20and%20createdDate%20%3E%3D%20%222020%2F05%2F04%22%20and%20type%20%3D%20Bug%20and%20status%20%3D%20Open>
>>>> .
>>>> I had a quick look and I don't see anything clearly blocking the LTS
>>>> release (JENKINS-63082 <http://jenkins-63082/> smells bad, but it was
>>>> already in the previous LTS, so not a regression).
>>>>
>>>> 2.249 looks good to me.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 12:00, Oliver Gondža <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Let's voice the baseline candidates and concerns so we have the
>>>>> candidate agreed on by the end of the week.
>>>>>
>>>>> To get the discussion started, how about 2.249?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://jenkins.io/changelog/
>>>>> --
>>>>> oliver
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/3292bcc0-2fb5-08ab-51b6-fb88f53c0eb4%40gmail.com
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Antonio Muñiz
>>>> Human, Engineer
>>>> CloudBees, Inc.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAJc7kzTmwdY875R4bV8h_tbRM4%2Bm3-XRiiqoHBccn8DUjJrQXQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAJc7kzTmwdY875R4bV8h_tbRM4%2Bm3-XRiiqoHBccn8DUjJrQXQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0B575C1E-06AD-4D04-BDA2-0424269AAB8F%40gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0B575C1E-06AD-4D04-BDA2-0424269AAB8F%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Daniel Beck
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> CloudBees, Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/aadb0f8f-7847-4ad6-a5a0-e396f03bbabeo%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/aadb0f8f-7847-4ad6-a5a0-e396f03bbabeo%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BiemXRGrxXv_%3DiPXvi6y3LQKcreT0Z3DWAqF-panTEjosA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAH-3BiemXRGrxXv_%3DiPXvi6y3LQKcreT0Z3DWAqF-panTEjosA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Matt Sicker
Senior Software Engineer, CloudBees

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAEot4owabVLYuycRD6RQEVJxhKNg3YxPhqCH_HTAM5W3NN0LVQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to