Parallel thread in Jenkins Infra: https://groups.google.com/g/jenkins-infra/c/DjUK9Ys82Mo Put my answers there
On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 6:10:45 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > > Hello dear Developers, Contributors and (eventually) users! > > The issue https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/INFRA-2879 is making a > proposal for a breaking change in the library of Docker images > ("jenkins/jnlp-agent-*") coming from the repository > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jnlp-agents . > > The rationale of this change (why running a container as non root) is not > expected to be discussed in this thread (please use the JIRA issue), but: > > 1. "Should we do this change"? As it even questions the reasons why we > provide and maintain this set of images. For instance > "jenkins/jnlp-agent-alpine" would be totally deprecated. > > 2. And if yes, "what is the process to communicate and apply a breaking > change?". Is there a standard procedure to go trough the > mail/twitter/IRC/etc. channels? We were thinking of adding documentation > (README of the repo + README of the images in the DockerHub + comments in > the respective Dockerfiles) and writing a blog post. Is there something > else? > > As the documentation for these image is scarse, it is hard to evaluate the > impact. If you have any knowledge on how it is being used (outside the > Jenkins project's infra.), could you share it to help us? > > > Thanks in advance! > > Damien DUPORTAL > > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e06fb690-dd0c-4e00-89aa-6218634fd885n%40googlegroups.com.
