I see no evidence that jenkinsci/jenkins#5687 has introduced a leak, so I do not think it should be reverted. I _do_ see evidence that registering AntClassLoader (specifically) as parallel-capable has increased the heap size requirement for pipeline-steps-doc-generator: 1280 MiB seems to be sufficient, while what JVM ergonomics picked for e.g. https://ci.jenkins.io/job/Infra/job/pipeline-steps-doc-generator/job/PR-92/1/consoleFull (945 MiB) is insufficient. My recommendation to operators is to adjust the hardware and/or -Xmx settings to ensure that a sufficiently large heap is provided.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjr8n9%2BLhHayps4Sfd0Ox%2BtoCrG2KMHdjNf4%2Bc2MJn9xfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
