Thanks Luca, it's a big help. I found a nice thread (with you and Ben, of 
course) that covers this exact question.

For reference: 
https://groups.google.com/g/repo-discuss/c/Bp36i7B3Uqo/m/3fxKgceVAAAJ

On Friday, December 3, 2021 at 1:26:16 PM UTC-8 lucamilanesio wrote:

> Possibly a question for the repo-discuss mailing list?
>
> The Checks plugin isn't a mandatory requirement of the Gerrit Code Review 
> plugin: if you have it, it can be used. If you don’t have it, you’ll keep 
> on using the labels.
>
> HTH
>
> Luca.
>
> On 3 Dec 2021, at 15:49, 'Wade Carpenter' via Jenkins Developers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's about the gerrit-code-review-plugin jenkins plugin, 
> https://github.com/jenkinsci/gerrit-code-review-plugin#integrating-with-the-gerrit-checks-plugin.
>  
> It's using the now-obsolete gerrit checks plugin to publish the build 
> status back to gerrit. The gerrit change is about restructing the way that 
> CI systems are integrated with gerrit, so this plugin is impacted.
>
>
> On Thursday, December 2, 2021 at 8:24:36 PM UTC-8 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry but what does this have to do with Jenkins?
>>
>> On Thu., Dec. 2, 2021, 8:14 p.m. 'Wade Carpenter' via Jenkins Developers, 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> (I was torn betwen -dev and -users for this thread, so hopefully I got 
>>> it right!)
>>>
>>> While I was looking at https://gerrit.googlesource.com/plugins/checks 
>>> today, 
>>> I saw the following:
>>>
>>> *DEPRECATION NOTICE*
>>> *The Gerrit team at Google has decided to discontinue work on the checks 
>>> plugin. The recommended solution is Checks UI 
>>> <https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/pg-plugin-checks-api.html>
>>>  which 
>>> surfaces results from an external CI/analysis system.*
>>>
>>> This seems to suggest that either we need to come up with a gerrit 
>>> "jenkinsci" plugin to provide a checks UI, or consider some other approach. 
>>> At this point I'm sorta waiting to see which direction 
>>> gerrit-review.googlesource.com goes in, but I was also wondering if 
>>> anyone here has thoughts on this.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Wade
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0aae5971-4e08-4570-94d8-742ad4deddc7n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/0aae5971-4e08-4570-94d8-742ad4deddc7n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/239be687-fead-4631-b0a6-e3e3e511f4d3n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/239be687-fead-4631-b0a6-e3e3e511f4d3n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/6bf78485-7d9a-4968-b73c-a7ad1d6daeb6n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to