[
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=161601#comment-161601
]
dogfood commented on JENKINS-13416:
-----------------------------------
Integrated in !http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/images/16x16/blue.png!
[jenkins_main_trunk #1659|http://ci.jenkins-ci.org/job/jenkins_main_trunk/1659/]
[FIXED JENKINS-13416] On demand slave provisioning is starting all
available slaves (Revision 5a32eca331bf1d5652ab908c356f0ed64de82c6f)
Result = SUCCESS
Kohsuke Kawaguchi :
[5a32eca331bf1d5652ab908c356f0ed64de82c6f|https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/5a32eca331bf1d5652ab908c356f0ed64de82c6f]
Files :
* core/src/main/java/hudson/slaves/RetentionStrategy.java
> On demand slave provisioning is starting all available slaves
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENKINS-13416
> URL: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-13416
> Project: Jenkins
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: slave-setup
> Affects Versions: current
> Reporter: Bruno Meneguello
> Assignee: Kohsuke Kawaguchi
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: jenkins-1.459.diff
>
>
> I'm using on demand slaves (on amazon) started by a shell script. When
> starting a job with all slaves disconnected, all my slaves are started
> together.
> When in debug, I'd noticed that "RetentionStrategy" "Demand" is testing
> "Computer.getDemandStartMilliseconds()" to connect the slave, but all slaves
> (that 'll take some time to wake up) pass in test.
> Shouldn't this strategy take in account if there are executor enough and
> nodes starting?
> I,ve made a change in RetentionStrategy that solves the problem. Anyone see
> any problem with this solution?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
