|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Yes, "random" is a poor choice of word, "based on current build executor" would be better wording. The idea that drives the display number to be based on build executor number is that display names generated based on build executors would bring greater stability to the build than display numbers that are purely random.
If you can't use the "Let Xvfb choose display name" option, I suggest that you reserve a port range that and use that as "Xvfb display name offset".
Randomized display names would require some kind of collision detection which would bring (IMHO) unneeded complexity to the Xvfb Jenkins wrapper.