|
||||||||
|
This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira |
||||||||
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Erik Ingman: I tried this change a month or so ago after somebody mentioned that documentation to me, but I found that it made no difference.
From re-reading the Android source code, I couldn't see any obvious technical reason why the ports have to be in that form (and only the "-port" flag, not "-ports" enforces it anyway), the "maximum" port number hasn't been 5584 for a long time, adb does recognise emulators started on high ports, and I also looked through lots of build logs for evidence that the user port being even and in that range makes a difference — I didn't find anything conclusive (in fact, emulator startup was more likely to fail in that case).
In addition, the code in this pull request doesn't guarantee that the first port will be even, so I'll have to be skeptical about your claims![]()
But if it turns out that this change nevertheless helps, then that's good to know. So what are the results you are seeing? Which OS are the emulator builds running on, and what is the emulator config? How many builds were failing previously, compared to now, and is that with builds whose user port is actually even?