Jesse Glick resolved Bug JENKINS-28021 as Not A Defect

The flow is doing what you requested: starting Job 1, and waiting for it to complete, which it does (successfully). The fact that it happened to trigger a downstream job is irrelevant. (It may not even know about the downstream job, if that is using a reverse build trigger.)

If you meant for Job 1 to wait for Job 2 to finish before itself completing, you would need to use the Parameterized Trigger plugin (or make Job 1 itself a workflow using build with wait: true).

Change By: Jesse Glick (21/Apr/15 8:48 AM)
Status: Open Resolved
Resolution: Not A Defect
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Issues" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to