If archiving allows referencing an artifact with a url, why not use the
Maven repository URL for the artifact?

And as to JAR naming (reponding to a previous post ), maven builds jars
with the version and optional SNAPSHOT tag, which is the way it should be
in my opinion...because I really dislike dredging through a whole pile of
jars trying to figure out what version is being used because every version
is named the same.
On Mar 15, 2012 11:53 AM, "Nicky Ramone" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks both. I think that could work.
> There a few other problems with pipelines and Maven. I will probably open
> another thread for this.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Pete <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> We do this but do not rely on the repository manager to pull down the
>> artifact.  We configure the Maven Jenkins build job to archive the
>> artifact and then in the downstream job we configure a run parameter
>> and execute a shell using the passed run url to download the artifact.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Nigel Magnay <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hard to tell without some more detail -- wouldn't the jar name be the
>> same
>> > each time anyway?
>> >
>> > You can probably craft something with a combination of copy-artifacts
>> > plugin, maven repository server plugin and possibly a groovy script..
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Nicky Ramone <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Did anyone get a chance to read this?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Nicky Ramone <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> Suppose I build a Java project with Maven and a two-stage pipeline:
>> >>> Stage 1: Packaging and unit-testing (here the jar is built and
>> deployed
>> >>> into the repository manager)
>> >>> Stage 2: Deploy to QA (here the jar is grabbed from the repository
>> >>> manager and placed in the QA server)
>> >>>
>> >>> How can I know which artifact name and version to grab at Stage 2?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you.
>> >>> Cheers.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to