Well, the name is one thing, but the artifacts themselves differ (I create two 
ZIP files, but only one (and which one?) ends up as Jenkins artifact.

I would expect that the Maven job type asks Maven about the job artifacts - but 
then I'm probably wrong  ;-)

For the moment I can live with the fact that I have to get artifacts from the 
workspace instead of Jenkins (even though I'll miss the nice permalinks). But 
should I write an issue in the Jenkins JIRA?

Best regards,
Eric



Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Im Auftrag von Stephen Connolly
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. Juni 2012 10:54
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Maven build results don't match Jenkins Build Artifacts

Those are what maven considers the artifacts, ie those are the names that will 
end up in the maven repository.

You can manually archive the files if the name is that important to you.

Of course I never use the maven job type as it does things (which make the 
users life initially easier) that are not the maven way. My preference is a 
maven build step in a freestyle project... But what would I know!

One of these days sacha will ok me writing a correct maven job type (something 
which I know how it should be done, but haven't had the time to do yet. Btw 
that fork of jenkins has not done it right either ;-) )

On Thursday, 7 June 2012, Lewis, Eric wrote:
Hi

Since changing from an old Hudson to Jenkins 1.460 I noticed that Maven's build 
results differ from what Jenkins considers Build Artifacts.
Specifically it has to do with renaming and using other results of the Maven 
assembly plugin.

For instance, I have a build which repackages some XML schemas in various forms.

Here's what it looks like in the workspace:

target/
|-- schemas.war
|-- xml-schemas-1.6.0-sources.jar
|-- xml-schemas-1.6.0.jar
|-- xml-schemas-application-server-1.6.0.zip
`-- xml-schemas-public-schema-server-1.6.0.zip

Here's what Jenkins considers build artifacts:
Build Artifacts
 xml-schemas-1.6.0-sources.jar
 xml-schemas-1.6.0.jar
 xml-schemas-1.6.0.pom
 xml-schemas-1.6.0.war
 xml-schemas-1.6.0.zip

Is this a known bug?

Best regards,
Eric

Reply via email to