The schema is dynamic based on the plugins installed and their
serialisation via xstream.

Backwards compatibility constrains should ensure that it is reasonably
stable, but you need to look at the backing classes to infer the purpose of
each field and what values it can take

On Tuesday, 21 August 2012, Ramith Jayasinghe wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> Does this means we don't have a documentation explaining the tags &
> attributes available?
>
> regards
> Ramith
> LSF (www.opensource.lk)
>
>
> On Aug 20, 6:49 pm, Mark Waite <markwa...@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > I've used your technique of creating a similar job from the GUI and
> passing that to the command line for multiple Jenkins releases.  It works
> very well for me.  I prefer that technique because it also allows me to
> compare my "archived" job definition (kept under source control for the
> project which it builds) with the actual implementation in the running
> Jenkins system.
> >
> > Mark Waite
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >________________________________
> > > From: Ramith Jayasinghe <ramithonl...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> > >To: Jenkins Users <jenkinsci-users@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>>
> > >Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 7:20 AM
> > >Subject: Creating a new Job Programatically.
> >
> > >Hi Everyone,
> > >I'm trying to create a job in jenkins programmatically (using Remote
> > >Access API). By playing around and reading the documentation I found
> > >that I could do this by sending a xml document ( with a query
> > >parameter specifying the name of the job) with the configuration over
> > >http/Rest.
> >
> > >Therefore, Is there any document about this XML document?
> >
> > >For example, I want to create a job for application which resides on a
> > >SVN repo and build-able using maven 3. If we don't have documentation
> > >for options (tags and attributes) available for this XML fragment; I
> > >could create a similar job using the GUI and adapt my implementation
> > >based on the config.xml created for it. Would that be a good idea?
> >
> > >Regards,
> > >- Ramith
> > >LSF (www.opensource.lk)
>

Reply via email to