Well... yes, that's true, but I also have the 64-bit version:

[root@ci ~]# yum info glibc
Installed Packages
Name        : glibc
Arch        : i686
Version     : 2.12
Release     : 1.132.el6_5.2
Size        : 13 M
Repo        : installed
>From repo   : RHEL-65-x86_64-updates
Summary     : The GNU libc libraries
URL         : http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/
License     : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+
Description : The glibc package contains standard libraries which are used by
            : multiple programs on the system. In order to save disk space and
            : memory, as well as to make upgrading easier, common system code is
            : kept in one place and shared between programs. This
particular package
            : contains the most important sets of shared libraries:
the standard C
            : library and the standard math library. Without these two
libraries, a
            : Linux system will not function.

Name        : glibc
Arch        : x86_64
Version     : 2.12
Release     : 1.132.el6_5.2
Size        : 12 M
Repo        : installed
>From repo   : RHEL-65-x86_64-updates
Summary     : The GNU libc libraries
URL         : http://sources.redhat.com/glibc/
License     : LGPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions and GPLv2+
Description : The glibc package contains standard libraries which are used by
            : multiple programs on the system. In order to save disk space and
            : memory, as well as to make upgrading easier, common system code is
            : kept in one place and shared between programs. This
particular package
            : contains the most important sets of shared libraries:
the standard C
            : library and the standard math library. Without these two
libraries, a
            : Linux system will not function.

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Richard Bywater <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok so looks like you've got the the x86 version of glibc installed on a
> 64-bit system (which I don't think is a default position). So I guess the
> question for Stephen was whether he had installed the x86 glibc as well
> during his testing of CentOS?
>
> Richard.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:18 AM, jieryn <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> -bash-4.1$ uname -a
>> Linux ci.acme.com 2.6.32-431.21.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 19:11:40
>> EDT 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> -bash-4.1$ ls -la /lib/libc.so.6
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Jun  3 09:57 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.12.so
>>
>> -bash-4.1$ ldd /lib/libc.so.6
>>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00813000)
>>         linux-gate.so.1 =>  (0x00391000)
>>
>> -bash-4.1$ file /lib/libc-2.12.so
>> /lib/libc-2.12.so: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version
>> 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux
>> 2.6.18, not stripped
>>
>> -bash-4.1$ rpm -qf /lib/libc.so.6
>> glibc-2.12-1.132.el6_5.2.i686
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Stephen Connolly
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, 16 July 2014, Richard Bywater <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Is your RHEL6.5 system running as 32-bit or 64-bit? Also what does
>> >> 'file
>> >> /lib/libc.so.6' show (I imagine it will show symbolic link so if you
>> >> then do
>> >> a file on the resulting link what does that show?)
>> >
>> >
>> > I am suspecting it could be an ld-script... Perhaps even one that starts
>> > with a comment...
>> >
>> > (Says he who may have found the RCA if not the origin Of the RCA)
>> >
>> >> Richard.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:45 AM, jieryn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not using any slave nodes of any kind. I just want to have a
>> >>> Jenkins job with access to an SSH agent such that it can work with SCM
>> >>> URIs of the type scm:svn:svn+ssh:// without me having to launch the
>> >>> master Jenkins instance via ssh-agent directly in the startup script.
>> >>>
>> >>> This is a RHEL 6.5 system that is fully up to date. It doesn't have
>> >>> any unusual hackery for multi-lib.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Stephen Connolly
>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> > This is an issue with which I have severe issues trying to
>> >>> > reproduce.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If you can document how you set up a slave node vm step by step from
>> >>> > a
>> >>> > known
>> >>> > starting point perhaps I may be able to fix the issue, but right now
>> >>> > *every*
>> >>> > time I try to recreate the issue the damn SSH Agent works for me.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > One working theory is that you have 32-bit and 64-bit shared
>> >>> > libraries
>> >>> > being
>> >>> > mis-identified...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Another working theory is that it is something to do with JNR and
>> >>> > classloader conflicts over remoting...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > All this is speculation though without a test case to verify against
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On 12 July 2014 03:05, jieryn <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> I'm using Jenkins LTS 1.554.3, and SSH Agent Plugin 1.4.1. I am
>> >>> >> seeing
>> >>> >> UnsatisfiedLinkError during jobs which try to use an SSH agent. How
>> >>> >> do
>> >>> >> I resolve this issue? There are only instructions for MacOS on the
>> >>> >> plugin wiki page.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> https://gist.github.com/jieryn/5248b713599321f2d548
>> >>> >> https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/SSH+Agent+Plugin
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Thank you.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> >> Groups
>> >>> >> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >>> >> send
>> >>> >> an
>> >>> >> email to [email protected].
>> >>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> > Groups
>> >>> > "Jenkins Users" group.
>> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> >>> > send
>> >>> > an
>> >>> > email to [email protected].
>> >>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >>> Groups
>> >>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> >>> an
>> >>> email to [email protected].
>> >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> >> Groups
>> >> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> >> an
>> >> email to [email protected].
>> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from my phone
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Jenkins Users" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to