James,

We are also experiencing this same issue.  Were you able to find more 
information?

Thanks,
Brantley

On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 at 4:20:52 AM UTC-5, James Telfer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working through this issue and trying to read other resources on 
> post-commit hooks without finding a match for the issue I'm experiencing.
>
> My jobs work fine, and SVN polling is working and triggering builds. 
> However, the post-commit hook in SVN doesn't trigger a build. Instead, the 
> following is written to the log:
>
> Nov 10, 2014 11:50:33 AM 
>> jenkins.scm.impl.subversion.SubversionSCMSource$ListenerImpl onNotify
>> INFO: Received post-commit hook from 104ea3cd-1caa-42bb-bcc1-
>> xxxxxxxxxxxx for revision 120,169 on paths [src/trunk/mgs/, ... (correct 
>> comma-separated path list)]
>> Nov 10, 2014 11:50:33 AM 
>> jenkins.scm.impl.subversion.SubversionSCMSource$ListenerImpl onNotify
>> INFO: No subversion consumers for UUID 
>> 104ea3cd-1caa-42bb-bcc1-xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> So far:
>
>    - The job is working manually, and via SVN polling
>    - The SCM trigger does not deny post-commit hooks
>    - The UUID is correct
>    - The paths appear to be correct
>    - The post-commit hook is using basic auth with a valid user name and 
>    API key (these work -- I used to trigger specific builds using this script)
>    - I'm not using the BlameSubversion plugin
>    - I have Jenkins 1.570 and SVN plugin 2.3.
>    - The SVN checkout for this item is marked with depth 'empty', but the 
>    source code appears only to check against the UUID (at this level).
>    
> I looked at the code for SubversionSCMSource.onNotify and setup a logger 
> at level 'FINE' for that class. Nothing interesting. I tried:
>
>> for (SCMSourceOwner owner : SCMSourceOwners.all()) { 
>
>     println owner 
>
> }
>
>
> In the console and found the collection has no elements. I tried:
>
>> println Jenkins.instance.getAllItems(SCMSource.class)
>
>
> as well but that's empty too.
>
> At this point I'm at a loss. It might need to be anonymous instead of 
> using basic auth (I'm trying that out) but apart from that I'm out of ideas.
>
> Does anyone have any other ideas I can try?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> James
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/b3dc02f7-e302-4913-88b3-caf0df7208ee%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to