I think I have managed , but the documentation is diffidently not that
clear and does not help .
in my sub workflow script\job - I do only limited stuff surrounded by
node('master') closer -- this way the executer is released very quickly -->
in my case its just load of external groovy script - that has a common
code and wrapper code for invoking jobs - (this is the reason for moving to
workflow).
that way the sub workflow script does not consume all available executers
of the master and they run really in parallel without the need to wait for
next free executer.
The only limitation(difference with build flow) I see now is that the sub
workflow job is not being running under the same executer( or any other
executer of the master) --> but this I think I can ignore.
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 at 10:58:06 AM UTC+3, EK wrote:
>
> Hi ,
> I am trying to move from build flow to workflow , but I am facing many
> issues in which some i have managed to overcome but now I am facing the
> following:
> while using build flow when running sub jobs in parallel they all where
> invoked in same executer on the master , but when I try to do the same in
> workflow each sub job needs its own executer of the master - and I find
> myself stuck as some are waiting for next available executer,
>
> I need help to know how I can invoke sub jobs in parallel while using same
> executer of the master ?
>
> Best Regards
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/4136b7ab-4561-4df9-8aea-e864ac4c2d81%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.