Why not have the triggering job be a workflow? Workflows do not eat up an
actual executor unless they are using a Node.

On 6 August 2015 at 11:10, Olli Sivonen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Sorry to reply to such an old post, but this is relevant to my current
> situation, and as I'm unable to find any other relevant discussion around
> this issue, I'm inclined to continue here instead of making a new topic.
>>
>>
> I'm trying to achieve the following: Non-blocking downstream build
> changing the build result of an upstream build.
>
> Previously I was able to use Groovy Postbuild to do this, since the
> assertation based limitation used in the core allowed such a hack. However,
> since core changed to use more restrictive checks, this method is now
> invalid.
>
> I know I could achieve the update of build result by triggering a blocking
> downstream build and then changing the result of the upstream build based
> on the results of the other build. However, I don't want to have the
> upstream build eating up an executor while waiting for the downstream job
> to finish.
>
> Why I'm trying to achieve this: We monitor some jobs externally and I
> would like to have as few jobs listed there as possible. Currently I'm
> building our software in one job and testing it in second, but I would only
> like to monitor the result of first job with the testing job affecting the
> result of the build job.
>
> I realize this probably isn't the standard way of working with Jenkins and
> I could probably use some pointers in that area as well, but this is our
> current setup and problem.
>
> Do you happen to have any idea if I can achieve what I've described, or
> should I just change my perspective on the issue and modify the job design?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/269813be-17fb-477b-86f9-b23a78f7c8ef%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/269813be-17fb-477b-86f9-b23a78f7c8ef%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CA%2BnPnMwpCH8WkQc1rWfP-yrPg-%2B65rMkVZBe_o3FSDGbWDL1og%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to