Le 31 déc. 2016 1:08 AM, "Daniel Beck" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On 30.12.2016, at 15:27, Baptiste Mathus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did you try the global > -Dhudson.model.ParametersAction.keepUndefinedParameters=true switch? > It's a good idea not to disable this security entirely if the threat described in the advisory is relevant, so hudson.model.ParametersAction.safeParameters is a better approach IMO. > At least, if the global one works, it will narrow down the scope of research here, so IMO worth trying. Agreed. Again, I was advising that only to narrow down the issue possibly. Not just to use that instead and Yolo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ msgid/jenkinsci-users/51F00B79-D3E0-4AF1-9D6D-56A888ADD78B%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CANWgJS6ni11m1Q7QWnPhDvk7R7CLCaeiksYCDVWCrpiisngDSQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
