I have the Basic Branch Build Strategies plugin installed in my
environment.  That seems like a worthwhile exploration to see if that
provides the desired behavior.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:59 PM Tom Duerr <[email protected]> wrote:

> A timing problem is an interesting idea but this problem seems constant.
> If its timing related, I would expect some inconsistent behaviors but you
> never can tell.
> We're using self-hosted GitHub Enterprise and sometimes it is laggy.
>
> Mark,
> Thanks, I may take you on that offer but I'm goint to try one more thing
> first. Slide has suggested that I install the "Basic Branch Build" plugin.
> Going to give that a shot.
>
> Thanks again for all your help.
> Tom
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 12:08 AM 'Björn Pedersen' via Jenkins Users <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> a wild guess: Is this a timing problem? So the push to branch gets build
>> before the pull request is filed?
>>
>>    push to (new) branch
>>         ------->   build 1 triggered
>>              --------------> file PR
>>                    ---------------> build 2 triggers
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ???
>>
>> Am Dienstag, 2. April 2019 04:21:29 UTC+2 schrieb Mark Waite:
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I can't duplicate the problem.
>>>
>>> I created a Multibranch Pipeline using
>>> https://bitbucket.org/markewaite/jenkins-bugs/src/master/ as the
>>> Bitbucket repository and using Bitbucket branch source cloning the
>>> repository over https.  The repository is not a fork and has two pull
>>> requests.  When I configure the Multibranch Pipeline job to 'Exclude
>>> branches that are also filed as PRs', it correctly excludes the two
>>> branches that are also filed as pull requests.  When I switch it to include
>>> only branches that are filed as PRs, it also behaves as expected.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I don't have other ideas to offer.  If you'd like to perform a
>>> detailed comparison between your configuration and mine, I'd be willing to
>>> temporarily grant you access to my Jenkins server.  Send me a private
>>> e-mail if you'd like that access.
>>>
>>> Mark Waite
>>>
>>>  On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 2:56 PM Tom Duerr wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Ive updated core Jenkins to 2.150.3 and updated quite a few of the
>>>> pipeline plugins.
>>>> Here is the current list:
>>>>     https://pastebin.com/Maf6iuvQ
>>>>
>>>> We're still getting two PRs for each PR created from the origin and not
>>>> a fork.
>>>>
>>>> I was going to try Slide's advice about filtering on branches but now
>>>> that config option
>>>> indicates that its been deprecated. Not sure where to configure the
>>>> "Named Branch" plugin.
>>>> https://imgur.com/a/smnC98S
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Other thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, March 29, 2019 at 10:55:04 AM UTC-7, Tom Duerr wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I will update the pipleline related plugins this weekend and maybe
>>>>> upgrade Jenkins (currently at 2.138 ).
>>>>> I will report back with results.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the help.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:29 PM Mark Waite wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:22 PM Tom Duerr wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>>> The issue only happens when the PR is NOT against a fork.  Its been
>>>>>>> difficult to debug since most of our developers
>>>>>>> use their own forks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think that is the same condition I'm using with the git client
>>>>>> plugin multibranch configuration that I'm using.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think I'm behind on most of the Pipeline related plugins except
>>>>>>> for the branch-source plugin. I had attempted a big
>>>>>>> upgrade of plugins last week that ended badly. Going to retry this
>>>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is the "Jenkins multibranch folder" ? I don't think we're
>>>>>>> actively using the multibranch plugin. Its unclear to me if we need
>>>>>>> that plugin or not if we're already using the branch-source plugin.
>>>>>>> The branch-source plugin seems to do everything we need
>>>>>>> to do. I think we will eventually want to use the multibranch plugin
>>>>>>> to provide different behaviors between a dev, qa or master branch.
>>>>>>> Assuming I actually understand how that plugin works.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I should have been more clear.  If you're using the GitHub branch
>>>>>> source plugin to define the job, then you're creating a multibranch job.
>>>>>> The multibranch job is represented as a folder which contains one job for
>>>>>> each branch in the repository.  The containing folder is what I called 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> "Jenkins multibranch folder".  No other plugin is needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:11 PM Mark Waite wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That's quite surprising, since my PR evaluation for the git client
>>>>>>>> plugin on my own fork is running with GitHub and is only showing the
>>>>>>>> 'pr-merge' job.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is the second job visible when executing in the Jenkins multibranch
>>>>>>>> folder?  If so, then I'm puzzled, because you're seeing something that 
>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>> not seeing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you running the most recent versions of the various plugins?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 6:06 PM Tom Duerr wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mark,
>>>>>>>>> I already have the "Exclude branches that are also filed as PRs"
>>>>>>>>> set.
>>>>>>>>> Guess that's part of my confusion.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 4:58 PM Mark Waite wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It might also work to filter branches based on the branch name at
>>>>>>>>>> some level, but that's more complicated that changing the "Discover
>>>>>>>>>> branches" setting in the plugin.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Picture looks like this:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [image: image.png]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:22 PM Slide wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This would generally be the branch filter parameter wouldn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>> You'd want to filter on the pr-* and master braches
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 16:20 Mark Waite wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought that was an indication that the GitHub branch source
>>>>>>>>>>>> is defined to both create a job for each branch and for each pull 
>>>>>>>>>>>> request.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think you need to reconfigure the job to not build a branch if 
>>>>>>>>>>>> it has a
>>>>>>>>>>>> matching pull request.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 5:17 PM Tom Duerr wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkin 2.138
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch-Source plugin 2.4.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SCM=Github Enterprise
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amazon Linux
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've recently started converting from freestyle jobs to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jenkinsfile/pipelines.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're seeing odd behaviors when pull requests(PR) are created
>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly from our
>>>>>>>>>>>>> main repo and not from a fork of the repo. Specifically around
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the git status checks. PRs that are NOT created from a fork
>>>>>>>>>>>>> result in two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> git checks and 2 full builds being kicked off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We see these 2 checks:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous-integration/jenkins/branch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The PRs from the developers fork, cause only 1 check and 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know how the 2 checks get created?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whats the difference between
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous-integration/jenkins/branch and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> continuous-integration/jenkins/pr-merge?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>> Mark Waite
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtFysXx%3Dnmb-UsBicoPoyoTBz6Ff2%2BkUo3FRR1v3awCpVg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtFysXx%3Dnmb-UsBicoPoyoTBz6Ff2%2BkUo3FRR1v3awCpVg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/04d47abd-75d0-48a4-a8ea-c4de77c1c84a%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/04d47abd-75d0-48a4-a8ea-c4de77c1c84a%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks!
>>> Mark Waite
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/7bab860e-712b-4abe-baca-1eb69b522a02%40googlegroups.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/7bab860e-712b-4abe-baca-1eb69b522a02%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAJuMdDPnCx5MMioeuUoOx%2B0LU2b%3DeiSgTzxOz1Qe-ExyQeiXMw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAJuMdDPnCx5MMioeuUoOx%2B0LU2b%3DeiSgTzxOz1Qe-ExyQeiXMw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>


-- 
Thanks!
Mark Waite

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtEi99O-r9xG0-SGLxBBJoyJyXJOwRoHuu%3DZ0gaYdKAZxg%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to