As far as I know, Pipeline can't be used that way.

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 3:58 PM Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, this is happening when there are changes on more than one branch.  We
> have a single "Pipeline" job defined to run against all branches in our
> repo.  Occasionally, there will be more than one branch with a change when
> the job is triggered by source control.  Currently, we have to manually
> start the job again to run the job against the additional branch.
>
> How do I make a "Pipeline" job schedule additional executions
> automatically when multiple candidate revisions are found, like the
> freestyle job does?  It seems like it should work out of the box and I see
> there's an extension (BuildSingleRevisionOnly) to disable that behavior.
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 5:02:29 PM UTC-4 Mark Waite wrote:
>
>> Multiple candidate revisions found was usually an indication that a
>> single job was defined to build multiple branches and it would switch from
>> one branch to the next as changes were detected in a specific branch.  That
>> was all that Freestyle jobs could offer.  It worked but the changes report
>> and the test results and other history items were unclear and very
>> difficult to interpret.  If the previous build was from the same branch
>>
>> Jenkins Pipeline allows you to define a multibranch pipeline so that
>> Jenkins will automatically create a new job each time a branch is detected
>> and will automatically destroy the job when a branch is deleted.  That
>> makes the history usable and simplifies the experience for users.
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:20 PM Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've setup a test with a repository that has several branches.  I
>>> created a freestyle jenkins job that uses Git SCM to checkout the repo.
>>> When I run this job, it shows the below and results in multiple executions
>>> of the job:
>>>
>>> Multiple candidate revisions
>>> Scheduling another build to catch up with <job name>
>>> Checking out Revision <id> (<branch>)
>>>
>>> I created a pipeline job, basically the same.  It uses checkout, $class
>>> GitSCM and no extensions.  When I run this job, it shows the below and does
>>> not schedule additional executions of the job:
>>>
>>> Multiple candidate revisions
>>> Checking out Revision <id> (<branch>)
>>>
>>> This is with Jenkins 2.235.5 and git-plugin 4.4.4, but this behavior has
>>> been consistent for some time.  Is this a bug or do I need to do something
>>> differently to get the pipeline script to schedule additional executions of
>>> the job when multiple candidate revisions are found?
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Keith
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Jenkins Users" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/748a80e8-38c5-41da-80ae-c3e8089fa20cn%40googlegroups.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/748a80e8-38c5-41da-80ae-c3e8089fa20cn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/eae56b3c-d187-42e3-854f-f80664122bb9n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/eae56b3c-d187-42e3-854f-f80664122bb9n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/CAO49JtHrJNu0i%3DHmu4PJOc%3DZ6TQKfR-FhSf8FY-VWvuAHqB9tg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to