I guess this question is better suited for https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev
[email protected] schrieb am Donnerstag, 5. August 2021 um 16:48:48 UTC+2: > Thanks for the reply. It looks like your repo is similar to > https://github.com/sheehan/job-dsl-gradle-example/, which is the example > that our repo is based on as well. We've got Specifications that test the > job DSL syntax and other job configuration stuff. And I see how the > resolveTestPlugins task in build.gradle saves plugins to the > build/resources/test/test-dependencies folder that the Jenkins test harness > will look in to get the plugins with which to load the in-memory Jenkins > instances. > > What I want to do is load those in-memory Jenkins instances spun up by the > Jenkins test harness with different plugins, depending on the Specification > being run. So for most Specifications, I'll use one set of plugins, but for > another set of Specifications, I'd like to use another... > > I thought that `new JenkinsRule().with(MyPluginManager.INSTANCE)` or > something like that would solve this issue for me, but I'm having trouble > with it. I'm seeking help on how to get this to work. > > I've updated my StackOverflow question with a link to a GitHub repo that > reproduces the problem I'm seeing: > https://github.com/matthiasdenu/plugin-manager-bug/tree/main > > Help is appreciated! > > On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 at 12:15:42 PM UTC-4 [email protected] > wrote: > >> We do not use Spock, but we have a process to test jobDSL definitions >> before applying changes see >> https://github.com/elastic/apm-pipeline-library/tree/master/.ci/jobDSL >> it test that the syntax is correct and test that you can create the job. >> Probably the class that helps you is >> https://github.com/elastic/apm-pipeline-library/blob/master/.ci/jobDSL/src/test/groovy/JobScriptsSpec.groovy >> >> , also it is really tricky to configure the plugins you need on >> https://github.com/elastic/apm-pipeline-library/blob/master/.ci/jobDSL/build.gradle#L29-L68 >> >> El miércoles, 30 de junio de 2021 a las 16:33:56 UTC+2, >> [email protected] escribió: >> >>> Hi, I'm trying to use a different set of plugins for different Spock >>> Specifications. I've posted a more detail question here: >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68196423/trouble-using-a-base-spock-specification-and-jenkinsrule-with-pluginmanager >>> >>> I'm hoping that someone might be able to provide some insight. Thank you. >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/5130cc41-fefc-4b04-a9a8-2c7838f5a57cn%40googlegroups.com.
