> Although the last "argument" of the accumulate CE is documented as a
> conditional element, it's actually coded as if it must be a pattern --
> i.e., a single patterm, no "and", "or", or "not." I'm having trouble
> imagining a tractable implementation that allows you to use a general
> conditional element here, so I'm tempted to call this a documentation
> bug. But let me give it some thought.

I think thet implementing a general CE would be very useful.

Yuri

--------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list
(use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to