Ernest Friedman-Hill wrote:
>
> Ouch! This wasn't small at all (at least, effect-wise.) Glad you caught
> this one. One-line fix: jess/NodeTerm.java:96 -
>
> was
> for (int i = 0; i<m_activations.size(); i++)
>
As a side note (irrelevant to JESS), this line of code is
fairly slow (and the slowness can't be optimized out by a
compiler because of threading issues).
The new line
> for (int i = m_activations.size()-1; i>=0; i--)
is quite a bit faster (only one call to m_activations.size())
Two good Java optimization links are:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jch/java/optimization.html
http://www.ibm.com/Java/education/javahipr.html
William Grosso
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
