> ...
> > because ?name is a Jess string, not a java object.
> >
> >
>
> Now this is really funny. This is exactly the same bug as I described
> earlier today, and jokingly said that although it is obscure, all bugs
> can seem obscure. It effects ONLY Strings passed to Object-wanting
> methods. You should (and will in the next version) be able to pass any
> subclasss of Object to this method and have it work.
Yes, I saw your other response a couple hours after I sent my note!
Funny how somtimes things resonate.
Anyway, thanks -- Great!
One less rule to respect in the next release!-)))
> Anyway, thanks for the report!
Sure. If reports like this save just one other soul some
debugging time, then they are worth sending out (IMHO).
-- Dan
Dan Larner, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xerox Parc, 3333 Coyote Hill Rd, Palo Alto CA 94304
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
