If the system naturally partitions itself into sequential phases,
then I'd suggest a change of strategy. View it as a procedure whose
steps are potentially complex (requiring jess, etc.)
Would you consider rewriting it as some over-arching procedure that
keeps track of the steps and interacts with jess where it makes sense to do
the complex reasoning?
That kind of strategy might clean up your problem.
-----Original Message-----
From: alan littleford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 2:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JESS: Modules ...
My system very naturally partitions itself into a number a sequential
phases,
where each phase is potentially complex (many complex rules and much 'record
keeping'). I found myself naturally writing names along the lines of
pretend-module-name-rule-name and likewise for facts. This was somewhat
messy, I
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list. List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
