If I got to vote for one feature, this would be it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is true if the set of rules to be fired is statically determined,
> when the rules are defined. If it's a decision-based process itself
> (my assumption) then modules wouldn't help at all.
>
> Defmodules are a good feature, though, and will show up in
> Jess... someday.
>
> I think Katz, Ed wrote:
> [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> > It is my belief that if JESS had a capability similar to CLIPS's
> > defmodule for partitioning the rule base, then the rules in the
> > individual modules could be selectively (as a group) allowed
> > to fire (those on the agenda of the active modules) excluding
> > those in other inactive module partitions. This could easily
> > be controlled both from JESS and Java using a CLIPS-like
> > "focus" feature.
> >
> > In Willie Wheeler's second example, placing each of the rules
> > into separate modules would allow such control by only allowing
> > rule evaluation to focus on the desired module(s) and rule group(s).
> > In fact, CLIPS's focus features allows a "stacking" capability to
> > provide a pre-determined ordering of module activations.
> >
> > -Ed Katz
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 3:18 PM
> > To: Willie Wheeler
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: JESS: Controlling rule firing
> >
> >
> > You should be able to achieve what you want by writing a custom
> > Strategy object. This recently became VASTLY simpler than it once
> > was. See the jess.Strategy interface and the jess.breadth and
> > jess.depth implementation classes. This wil let you move the rule you
> > want to fire next to the top of the Agenda. Then use dynamic
> > salience, to force the agenda to be reordered before each cycle. Then
> > use (run 1) in a loop and stop calling it when there are no more rules
> > that you want to be fired.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I think Willie Wheeler wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > In the application I am writing, I need to be able to choose rules
> > > in two different ways. The first is just the standard fact-driven way,
> > > and there is no problem here. But for the second way, the Java program in
> > > which Rete is embedded needs to be able to choose which activated rule to
> > > fire. Is there a way to do this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Willie
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > Ernest Friedman-Hill
> > Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
> > Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
> > Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
> > Livermore, CA 94550
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
> > list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Ernest Friedman-Hill
> Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154
> Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234
> Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov
> Livermore, CA 94550
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
> list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the
list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------