This e-mail goes to the JADE, JESS and protege list (sorry for duplicates) After some discussion on how JADE, JESS and protege could be combined (see one of the threads below), I have compiled examples of how you can have all 3 of them at once. Even if you don't want to use protege ontologies for processing of JADE messages in JESS rules, the option of starting JADE from within a running JESS engine might be interesting for you. The code is available as part of the latest JADE snapshot http://sharon.cselt.it/projects/jade/ under the src/examples/JadeJessProtege directory. You need the latest versions of JADE and JESS for the start-JADE-from-JESS example plus the latest versions of protege and the JessTab for the start-JADE-from-the-JessTab-and-use-protege-ontologies-in-message-processing-example. :) Oliver Hoffmann >At 11:05 24.04.01 +0200, Gabriel Hopmans wrote: >>I don't have experience with Prot�g� but it seems very interesting. >>Buddy Kresge wrote that you can load Jess as a plug-in, but how far and what >>can you do with Prot�g� when you are using JADE and Jess? >>I suspect you can't embed them all, but that you have to work with two >>separate 'environments'. >>Has anyone experience with both? >> >>__________________________________________________ >>Gabriel Hopmans >>IST-researcher >>Multi-Agent Systems Technology >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>University Maastricht >>Section Communications Research & Semiotics >>Grote Gracht 82, Maastricht >>P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands >>T + 31 43 388.2769 / 2767 >>F + 31 43 388.2744 >>M + 31 6 27.237.606 >>__________________________________________________ >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Buddy Kresge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: "'Jones, David H'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 6:03 PM >>Subject: RE: JESS: JESS and richer declarative knowledge >> >> >>Check out Prot�g� at Stanford University. >> >>The link is http://protege.stanford.edu >> >>You can then load in (as a plug in) Jess. >>This gives you jess functionality embedded in >>an Ontological environment. >> >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jones, David H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 11:45 AM >>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>Subject: JESS: JESS and richer declarative knowledge >> >> >>Have anyone examined or can anyone speculate on how JESS could make use of >>richer declarative knowledge, such as what can be found in an ontology >>encoded in Standard-OIL (as described in >>http://www.ontoknowledge.org/oil/downl/semantics.pdf). In particular, OIL >>has constructs for defining axioms about classes (disjoint, covered, >>disjoint-covered, equivalent), and slot properties (transitive, symmetric, >>functional, inverse). How would/could the JESS engine or a JESS program >>make use of these additional semantics? >> >> >> >> >>Regards, >> >>David H. Jones >>Boeing Phantom Works, >>Mathematics and Computing Technology >>425-865-6924 >>425-865-2964 (FAX) >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
