Hello, Is it possible to assert a need- fact with the definstance function? For example I have made a deftemplate have, associated with the Java class Have and with the do-backward-chaining function I've made also a deftemplate need-have. Now I would like to do this:
(bind ?needhave (new Have)) (definstance need-have ?needhave dynamic) just as I would create a have fact like: (bind ?have (new Have)) (definstance have ?have dynamic) Jess gives an error message when I try the first thing :-( Bye, Sander -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
