I think Alexander Lamb wrote:
> Am I doing something "philosophically wrong" or is a it correct way to view > development with Jess? > > It is more or less as if my Java classes where only used to store data and > map the data to the screen, etc... And all the algorithmic part is handled > by Jess rules. > > Alex There's nothing at all wrong with this architecture. As is stated in the introduction to the Jess manual, there is a continuum of possible architectures for Jess applications; some use Jess as the center, while others use Jess as a sort of subroutine, placing control elsewhere. If you look at the list of architectures in section 1.9, your application is somewhere around #5, right in the middle, I think (no custom commands, but instead, Java Beans which execute "commands" (like mapping data to the screen) on Jess's behalf.) --------------------------------------------------------- Ernest Friedman-Hill Distributed Systems Research Phone: (925) 294-2154 Sandia National Labs FAX: (925) 294-2234 Org. 8920, MS 9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] PO Box 969 http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov Livermore, CA 94550 -------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send the words 'unsubscribe jess-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the BODY of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], NOT to the list (use your own address!) List problems? Notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
